Helmets and Fighting and the CHL
While everyone is talking about the trades in the CHL this week (and I will be doing so over the weekend), something else happened in the OHL yesterday that I want to bring to everyone's attention.
No one who is involved with hockey was untouched by the news that Whitby Dunlops player Don Sanderson was fatally injured during a fight in a hockey game last month, and then tragically passed away from his injuries last week. According to reports (I have not seen video of the fight, so can't say from personal observation), Sanderson's helmet popped off during the fight, and when his head hit the ice, it caused a severe brain injury. Despite the wonderful play by the Canadian U20 team in the WJCs and the exciting trades that were expected in junior hockey, the sadness upon hearing of the death of a young player was palpable in the industry.
Sanderson's injuries and subsequent passing raised the often debated topic--should there be fighting in hockey? This discussion is a healthy one, but often when tragedies happen, there are responses to try to remedy things before really thinking them through. Yesterday the OHL proved that to be true.
The league disciplined Brad Mashinter of the Belleville Bulls and James DeLory of the Oshawa Generals for removing their helmets prior to a fight on Wednesday night. (Each player will sit out a game and their teams will pay a symbolic $100 fine.)
According to the league announcement, it had "discussed with all its Member Teams the importance of players not removing their helmets during the course of the game for their health and welfare. We find the actions of the two players most inappropriate, inconsiderate and concerning. Fortunately, neither player was injured."
We all know that this is a very dangerous game to play. We also know that most of the injuries sustained during hockey fights come from hitting of one player's hand against the opponent's helmet. Injuries from a player hitting his head on the ice are rare. Dieing from such an accident is so rare that, I can only remember one other such incident in my not so short lifetime.
For as long as I can remember, if non-professional players are going to fight, its been proper courtesy to take their helmets off first. (Professionals don't do it, only because part of the fight is to get the other player's helmet off his head.) So I was surprised to see the word "inconsiderate" in the OHL's press release.
It's an odd choice of words. It is considered courteous to take one's helmet off before a fight. Plus, the failure of players to take their helmet off will cause great harm to their opponents' hands over time. If the removal of helmets is forbidden, you will wind up with many young fighters whose hands are permanently damaged.
Being an attorney, I understand that there are legal issues here. After Sanderson's death, the OHL might be considered to be on notice that the removal of helmets during fighting could kill a player. This is particularly sticky because fighting is supposed to be against the rules, and the OHL knows it happens but does not ban fighting completely.
And that is the question here. By making this rule change, is the OHL trying to eliminate fighting completely from its games, without saying it outright? The elimination of fighting from hockey is most definitely a legitimate topic for discussion. But this rule is unwise, and ultimately dangerous to the players. The OHL should either ban fighting or let the game continue in the manner it has been played for generations.