With most eyes on the British Open this morning, lets just turn back to junior hockey for a few minutes. The latter half of last week was full of
WHL news, particularly changes in coaching and management. Here are a bunch of names and teams, and then a comment on the
Kamloops Blazers' ownership situation.
The Edmonton Oil Kings announced that the team had hired
Rocky Thompson to be an assistant coach during the team's inaugural 2007-08 season. And while the Oil Kings were hiring their new assistant, the Portland Winter Hawks decided to go forward without seven-year Head Coach
Mike Williamson. The team is searching for a replacement. Vancouver Giants assistant coach
Sean Crowther has also left for some unspecified greener pastures. No replacement has been announced.
The Swift Current Broncos
announced Friday that
Tim Kehler, former General Manager and Head Coach of the
BCHL Trail Smoke Eaters, will become an assistant coach for the Broncos this coming season. He will join Swift Current this next week.
And then there is the
Kamloops Blazers news. The team announced Wednesday that the GM and Head Coach
Dean Clark, Asst. GM and Asst Coach
Shane Zulyniak, Asst Coach
Andrew Milne, and Marketing Director
Dave Chyzowski had all re-signed to lead the team during the 2007-08 season.
But the Blazers announced an equally or more important development the same afternoon. The Blazers Sports Society, an entity that will determine whether the team should be sold (the Blazers are held in a limited partnership), revealed that it had received another offer to buy the team. In an ongoing saga, the entity "River City Hockey, Inc." has made a second offer in a year, this time for over $6.1 million.
The entity, allegedly led by "partners" Tom
Gaglardi, Shane
Doan,
Jarome Iginla, Mark
Recchi, and Darryl
Sydor, seeks to change the operations of the team such that it will operate "under a business model rather than a non-profit model."
Hmm. If they are looking to operate under a business model, why have they not first of all told us what type of entity the group is? Calling themselves an "Inc." and then saying that the group has "Partners" is itself deceptive, as legally, a corporation can't have partners.
Then take a look at their website at www.rivercityhockey.ca and see if it does not bother you just a little. Yes, it's a sales pitch, but it goes too far. Even the "Your say" section. According to the site, no one has posted any negative remarks about their possible takeover to them. Hard to believe, given the whole situation. Further, while there are many reasons that a non-profit model can be a preferable to a business model for a junior club, the site tries to indicate otherwise. It clearly says in their vision,
"[i]t is a simple fact that for-profit management models outperform not-for-profit volunteer models in business -- and both the Kamloops Blazers, the League and junior hockey demand this level of business performance." Never mind that "the Kamloops Blazers, the League and junior hockey" are three things and not two, so the word "both" does not belong preceding them. It is important to remember that we are talking about junior hockey hockey here. Not just any old business. "Not-for-profit" managements have no other priorities than the club and the players. Yes, the idea is to balance the budget and make sure the money is there to perform your stated goal, but the whole idea of a "not-for-profit"
CHL team is to put a good product on the ice and to develop young players, nothing else. The out-and-out idea behind "for-profit" entities is to make money. Not to develop players, not to give the fans a good show, but to make money. And if the team does not make money in the market, the need to make money dictates that the team should be moved to a better market. It's certainly a potential conflict, and one faced by very many of the
CHL clubs. Some do a better job of balancing the clubs needs, but loyalty to markets, developing young players and making money can often be mutually exclusive.
The "Blazers Society" has called a meeting on August 7
th to address the River City Hockey Group's proposal. Lots of money is on the table; let's hope that the Society can find a way to solve the Blazers' problems that doesn't involve selling the club to a group with a "for-profit" model. I am still hoping so, but the hockey gods are not on my side.